Problem compiling with patch mp050226-V3-1-CVS20071126-3

Bert Wesarg bert.wesarg at googlemail.com
Sat Sep 12 11:34:21 CEST 2009


On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 10:52, Eric Bouyoux <eric.bouyoux at insidefr.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to compile nedit-latest-sources-HEAD (from September 10th)
> with patch mp050226-V3-1-CVS20071126-3.
> The patch command works fine, the make docs too.
> The make linux fails with :
>
> patternMatch.c: In function 'doesPatternElementMatch':
> patternMatch.c:691: attention : passing argument 4 of 'ExecRE' makes
> integer from pointer without a cast
> patternMatch.c:691: attention : passing argument 7 of 'ExecRE' makes
> pointer from integer without a cast
> patternMatch.c:691: erreur: too many arguments to function 'ExecRE'
> patternMatch.c: In function 'searchPatternForward':
> patternMatch.c:1001: attention : passing argument 4 of 'ExecRE' makes
> integer from pointer without a cast
> patternMatch.c:1001: attention : passing argument 7 of 'ExecRE' makes
> pointer from integer without a cast
> patternMatch.c:1001: erreur: too many arguments to function 'ExecRE'
> patternMatch.c: In function 'searchPatternBackward':
> patternMatch.c:1133: attention : passing argument 4 of 'ExecRE' makes
> integer from pointer without a cast
> patternMatch.c:1133: attention : passing argument 7 of 'ExecRE' makes
> pointer from integer without a cast
> patternMatch.c:1133: erreur: too many arguments to function 'ExecRE'
> patternMatch.c: In function 'getPatternLocatedAtPos':
> patternMatch.c:1985: attention : passing argument 4 of 'ExecRE' makes
> integer from pointer without a cast
> patternMatch.c:1985: attention : passing argument 7 of 'ExecRE' makes
> pointer from integer without a cast
> patternMatch.c:1985: erreur: too many arguments to function 'ExecRE'
>
> How to solve the problem ?
Try this patch:

http://kgb2.thruhere.net/~bertw/mp050226-V3-1-CVS20080907-2.patch

Bert
>
> Thanks.
>
> Eric.
>
> --
> NEdit Discuss mailing list - Discuss at nedit.org
> http://www.nedit.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>
>


More information about the Discuss mailing list