syntax highlighting repository

[Thorsten Haude]

Hi,

* Nick Sutterer wrote (2007-02-17 17:30):
>hey thorsten,
>
>> In case it's not your second set: There are already two Ruby pattern
>> sets I know of, please think long and hard before adding a third.
>>
>it's not ;-) i know these pattern, but unfortunately they are insufficient, i 
>had to fix and extend. this leads me directly to my second point: if there 
>were some kind of repository there would be only one ruby pattern which would 
>be perfect.

Well, I doubt perfect, and there might be differernt preferences, but
I agree that it would help to pool resources.


>when i say repository i don't exclusively mean svn. i think of some 
>forge-style database where developers *can* use a svn-repository to keep 
>track of their "software", and users can download the releases via 
>point-and-click.
>if this infrastructure is set up we *could* build some CPANish package system 
>for automatic download and installation.

It's kind of dependent on each other, as the software on the webapp
server must support non-interactive clients. Anyway, this interface
can be changed, so any of the two would be good news.


Thorsten
-- 
Given that sooner or later we're all just going to
die, what's the point of learning about integers?
    - Calvin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://www.nedit.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20070219/f1c56949/attachment.bin