UTF-8 support not on the road map?

Thorsten Haude yoo at vranx.de
Sun Dec 30 17:47:03 CET 2007


Hi,

* Joachim Lous wrote (2007-12-30 15:52):
>But it's not really a roadmap as long as it's not actually used to
>guide development.

Yes.


>We could start using it, but then we need to update it in accordance
>with actual priorities.

Yes.


>For instance, if there is agreement that we need a code cleanup before adding
>new features, then of course that should move to the top of the list.

Yes.


>And developers need to actually spend their NEdit time on the top priority tasks

Yes.


>If we do not turn it into a real roadmanp, then we should probably
>remove or rename
>the 'roadmap' page, since it might actually be an impediment to
>progress: interested
>contributors might think that work on these is already under way, and
>not start on them.'
>themselves.

Why would they think so? Roadmap routinely cover future topics.


Thorsten
-- 
Given that sooner or later we're all just going to
die, what's the point of learning about integers?
    - Calvin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://www.nedit.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20071230/38c475bb/attachment.bin


More information about the Discuss mailing list