UTF-8 support not on the road map?
Thorsten Haude
yoo at vranx.de
Sun Dec 30 17:47:03 CET 2007
Hi,
* Joachim Lous wrote (2007-12-30 15:52):
>But it's not really a roadmap as long as it's not actually used to
>guide development.
Yes.
>We could start using it, but then we need to update it in accordance
>with actual priorities.
Yes.
>For instance, if there is agreement that we need a code cleanup before adding
>new features, then of course that should move to the top of the list.
Yes.
>And developers need to actually spend their NEdit time on the top priority tasks
Yes.
>If we do not turn it into a real roadmanp, then we should probably
>remove or rename
>the 'roadmap' page, since it might actually be an impediment to
>progress: interested
>contributors might think that work on these is already under way, and
>not start on them.'
>themselves.
Why would they think so? Roadmap routinely cover future topics.
Thorsten
--
Given that sooner or later we're all just going to
die, what's the point of learning about integers?
- Calvin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://www.nedit.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20071230/38c475bb/attachment.bin
More information about the Discuss
mailing list