Niki not there

[Joerg Fischer]

Thorsten Haude wrote:

> >server, and we would need an alternative. I've proposed a solution for
> >that, but it would rely on the FTP tree being placed into version
> >control at Sourceforge.
> 
> Ok, let's use lazy approval:
> 
> Anybody opposed to the proposed changes?

No opposition, but the problem could be that the proposal would
require some more changes.  It doesn't make sense to put the daily
snapshot tarball in CVS, I guess.  Actually, only the contrib folder
seems good for CVS, IMO.

Jörg