Per-directory settings

[Thorsten Haude]

Hi,

* Tony Balinski wrote (2006-08-31 06:00):
>Quoting Thorsten Haude <yoo at vranx.de>:
>> * Tony Balinski wrote (2006-08-31 04:51):
>> >Much as I sympathise about the Wrap Margin and Hairline merge (I burnt
>> >a few cycles there myself), I think in principle small patches are better.
>>
>> What for? As I said, my aim is not optimize patches for inclusion into
>> the code base, just to use them. I already worked with lots of smaller
>> patches, and it was not fun.
>
>For others who, like me, might want to include features one at a time, and
>get used to them before including any more.

Well, sorry, but you have to take it all. I don't see the problem
though, all but the latest stuff should work fine and can be safely
ignored most of the time.


>> >My hope has been to split your megapatch into smaller, more atomic units,
>> >but I've only just started looking into it. There are a few easy things
>> >I have cribbed from you: the $NEDIT_HOME built-in variable springs to
>> >mind.
>>
>> Go ahead, just don't expect any support from me. (Let me know though
>> if anything comes up that also affects the Collection.)
>
>So I have your blessing ;-) Cheers!

You don't need it; it's Free.

And in case the statement above sounds a bit harsh: I don't want to
say that I won't answer question or similar silly things; I just won't
start juggling a dozen patches again.


Thorsten
-- 
If people had understood how patents would be granted when most
of today's ideas were invented and had taken out patents, the
industry would be at a complete stand-still today.
    - Bill Gates
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://www.nedit.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20060831/e8bfe2e2/attachment.bin