NEdit 5.5 RC1 segfaults

[Nathaniel Gray]

On Aug 5, 2004, at 6:55 AM, Eric Depagne wrote:

> on Thursday 05 August 2004 04:51, Nathaniel Gray wrote:
>> On Aug 4, 2004, at 11:50 AM, Eric Depagne wrote:
>>>    With Motif: 2.1.0 [@(#)GNU/LessTif Version 2.1 Release 0.93.34]
>>> (UNTESTED)
>>
>> I don't get it.  0.93.34 is on the known-bad list.  It shouldn't show
>> up as UNTESTED.  Did you hack check_lin_tif.c?
>>
> I forced the compilation with this version of LessTiff because it is 
> the only
> one I have!
>
> And the compilation worked with the 5.4 version of NEdit, so I tried!

That's fine, but it should show up in the version info as KNOWN-BAD, 
you should have had to define -DBUILD_BROKEN_NEDIT and you should have 
had to acknowledge a warning message asking you not to report bugs 
unless you could reproduce them on a known-good system.  I'm wondering 
if there's a bug in our code or you just ignored the warnings.

Cheers,
-n8

--
 >>>-- Nathaniel Gray -- Caltech Computer Science ------>
 >>>-- Mojave Project -- http://mojave.cs.caltech.edu -->