TODO (bug fixes)

[Thorsten Haude]

Hi,

* Scott Tringali wrote (2008-01-04 10:30):
>Thorsten Haude wrote:
>
>>It sure is, that's why I wondered why you would bring these things up.
>>I don't mind if additional bugs are closed before the release, but we
>>should focus on the release-criticals.
>
>Not to put too fine a point on it, but I think the selection of 
>release-criticals is too overreaching.

Boy, wouldn't it have been nice to see this kind of involvement when
we had the problem on the agenda?

I get the impression that the current selection of bugs declared
release-critical is not particularly well-liked. So I will cut them
back to I think is essential. Please let me know if you think the new
list should be re-expanded or cut down further.


I will also apply the remaining cleanups that are already prepared.
Sorry, but I don't think the sudden rush should mean that the work
done should invalidated. I will even cut back on the appropriate
prudence and commit them quickly, so that they can be checked by
others more easily.


Thorsten
-- 
The existing IP companies have nothing to offer in the new world, and no hope
of adopting. Therefore they must fight to the death to maintain the old one.
    - crucini
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://www.nedit.org/pipermail/develop/attachments/20080104/c28634d6/attachment.bin