TODO (bug fixes)

[Scott Tringali]

Thorsten Haude wrote:

> It sure is, that's why I wondered why you would bring these things up.
> I don't mind if additional bugs are closed before the release, but we
> should focus on the release-criticals.

Not to put too fine a point on it, but I think the selection of 
release-criticals is too overreaching.

If we want to get it out the door, we should focus on *regressions from 
the last release, and cut out absolutely everything else.  At this point 
in the lame I would drop anything that doesn't cause nedit to crash and 
ship it.

I see too many bugs nominated for fixing, or just committed, that aren't 
regressions.  Perhaps it causes some other bugs/regressions.  The result 
is we get further away from a release instead closer to one.

We can't fix every bug, but we can certainly make the next release 
incrementally better than that previous one.