TODO (bug fixes)

[Joerg Fischer]

Thorsten Haude wrote:

> It sure is, that's why I wondered why you would bring these things up.
> I don't mind if additional bugs are closed before the release, but we
> should focus on the release-criticals.

[ 1065303 ] screen refreshment error -> priority 9
[ 1717911 ] cursor not erased completely -> priority 5

In both cases I read something like "select something and hit
backspace then the cursor isn't erased completely"[1].  So, we should
focus on the priority 9 one and be questioned when mentioning the
other one?

> >> >#1628593  Unnecessary window grow when opening file
> >> >
> >> > annoying for line number users
> >> > fix submitted - not in cvs
> >> 
> >> Yeah, it's kind of nasty and I got distracted while looking it over.
> >
> >I have applied it for testing.  I got compiler warnings about const in
> >static int updateGutterWidth(const WindowInfo* window) and
> >static int updateLineNumDisp(const WindowInfo* window)
> 
> That's my const, and it's more documentation than of real value. I
> wonder about the warnings though, what compiler do you use and at what
> -W level?

gcc with default -W level (ie, don't given on command line), but I
thought Bert submitted the patch.  Anyway, it's pretty clear if one
tells the compiler a variable would be const and then uses it as
non-const the compiler informs you that const was discarded, unless
one turns warnings off completely.
 
Jörg


[1]  #1717911 has a fix attempt attached, btw.