Release? 2006.08.08

[AVKuznetsov]

On Fri, 22 Aug 2008 09:33:11 +0200
"Bert Wesarg" <bert.wesarg at googlemail.com> wrote:

Hi,

> > May be, it is a time to fix the CVS code as NEdit 5.6 and open new branch?
> Just my thoughts:
> 
> * ignore the binaries
> * branch off a 5.6 release and tag it as beta1, rc1, or whatever NOW
> * make the tarball and upload it to SF
> * people can provide binaries if they want
> * linux distributors will provide own binaries

I think, 32bit-linux-static binary is needed.
Many users (including "64bit users", I hope) will happy with it.
Standard binary is needed to separate code bugs from bugs introduced
by the "compilation environment".

> * think about a policy for committing patches/features to master
> (there are so many, that we should narrow this down)
> 
> To the last point, maybe we can create multiple branches (one for
> macro language, one for general editor features, ...) so that we have
> multiple playgrounds, from where we build master and tag betas.
> 
> Just my 2ct
> 
> Bert
> 

Alexey